DeepSeek vs ChatGPT: A Detailed Comparison

The landscape of AI is growing and evolving smarter day by day with new features and models challenging the existing ones. Among the latest contenders, DeepSeek from China emerges as a rival for OpenAI’s ChatGPT in natural language processing, reasoning, and overall performance. But how do we know which model is the best?

In this detailed breakdown, we’ll examine DeepSeek vs ChatGPT, analyzing their capabilities, strengths, and potential limitations. We’ll cover key areas like language understanding, response accuracy, creative abilities, coding proficiency, and real-world usability. Whether you’re a developer, business owner, or everyday user looking for the best AI assistant, this comparison will help you make an informed decision.

DeepSeek vs ChatGPT: A Brief Overview

Here’s a comparison table for DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT, covering a basic overview of the models:

Features	DeepSeek	ChatGPT (GPT-4)
Country of Origin	China	USA
Developed by	DeepSeek AI	OpenAI
Pricing	Offers free plan	Free + Plan(ChatGPT Plus costs $20/month)
Data	Uses publicly available and proprietary datasets	Trained on a mix of public and licensed data
Security	Sends data to U.K and China	Safe and compiled with regulations

Content Generation Analysis

Both ChatGPT and DeepSeek are powerful tools for content creation, leveraging the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate high-quality, contextually relevant content. Whether it’s crafting blogs, emails, social media posts, or even creative writing, these platforms excel in providing efficient and effective solutions for a wide range of content needs.

Here the ChatGPT 4o and DeepSeek R1 are compared in writing an E-mail for the prompt: “Write a professional email on approaching a company to use our service on Video Editing Software of approximately 150 words. The email should be clear, concise, and polite”

ChatGPT and DeepSeek have generated good content for the email. However, DeepSeek has produced slightly better content in terms of understanding the reader’s requirements and explaining how the video editing software will benefit them.

But we should not give the crown to DeepSeek as we only compared ChatGPT’s 4o version while ChatGPT’s o3-mini version has a score of 63 in comparison to DeepSeek’s score.

Architectural Analysis

DeepSeek R1 uses a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture, activating 37B of 671B parameters for efficiency, with RL post-training and a $5.5M training cost. ChatGPT, built on GPT-4o, features a dense 1.8T parameter model, optimized for versatile language tasks, with training costs exceeding $100M.

They both are large language models designed for content generation, problem-solving, and human-like interactions, but they have key architectural differences that impact their performance and usability. Some of the key differences are given below:

Feature	DeepSeek	ChatGPT
Base Model	DeepSeek-V2 (Custom LLM)	GPT-4 (OpenAI’s proprietary model)
Training Data	Web data, code, and domain-specific datasets	Diverse internet sources, books, and proprietary datasets
Fine-Tuning Approach	Optimized for multilingual and technical tasks	Fine-tuned for general, creative, and technical applications
Token Handling	High token efficiency, optimized for long-context understanding	Handles long-context well, but optimized for structured responses
Inference Speed	Faster inference for short-form content	Optimized for both speed and coherence
Specialization	Stronger in technical, research-oriented, and multilingual tasks	Excels in creative, conversational, and business writing
API & Accessibility	Limited public API access	Widely available via OpenAI API
Model Size	Large-scale parameter model	Proprietary large-scale LLM
Performance Strengths	Better at structured technical content and requirement understanding	More natural and engaging responses with contextual depth

Performance Comparision

Performance benchmarks evaluate a model’s efficiency, accuracy, and capability across various tasks. Models are tested on Mathematics, Coding, Reasoning, and multimodal tasks to measure their effectiveness. Let’s check their performances!

Mathematical Analysis

When it comes to Mathematical tests DeepSeek is said to have a better accuracy rate, surpassing GPT-4o, while ChatGPT has an accuracy rate on advanced benchmarks. When asked about the problem: 

“The recommended daily calcium intake for a 20-year-old person is 1,000 milligrams (mg). One cup of milk contains 299 mg of calcium, and one cup of juice contains 261 mg of calcium. Which of the following inequalities represents the possible number of cups of milk, m, and cups of juice, j, a 20-year-old person could drink in a day to meet or exceed the recommended daily calcium intake from these drinks alone?

 299m + 261j ≥ 1,000

 299m + 261j > 1,000

299m + 261j ≥ 1,000”

299m + 261j > 1,000 

Both the models gave the correct answer. While Deepseek also checked for other answers indicating its mathematical approach to check the validity.

Coding Analysis

For the coding analysis, we have tested out both ChatGPT and DeepSeek to generate a
candle flame animation to testify to their accuracy in coding. In this part, DeepSeek has really outperformed ChatGPT’s code and gave a wonderful output.

The given prompt: “Write a code for an animation of a candle with flame burning. Make sure the animation is as excellent as possible”

While ChatGPT made a major mistake in the flame by placing it on the right side of the candle and unwanted red movements below the candle, DeepSeek has done a wonderful job in detail with realistic flame and a yellowish background.

But this doesn’t mean the obvious winner is DeepSeek, as when asked about “make it even more realistic with smoke and extra elements” DeepSeek replied this:

This shows that DeepSeek has server issues that are causing an interruption.

Reasoning Analysis

DeepSeek excels in step-by-step logical reasoning, providing concise and precise answers, whereas ChatGPT offers more detailed explanations suitable for users preferring extensive context.

In many reasoning categories, DeepSeek has outperformed ChatGPT showing its capability to think and answer logically and reasonably. Below is the set of comparisons for MMLU-Pro and Humanity’s Last Exam.

Speed Analysis

The execution speed of all the ChatGPT versions is impressive when compared to DeepSeek showing faster output of tokens.

Features Comparision

ChatGPT offers many more features and integrations than DeepSeek for multimodal tasks which goes beyond text-based interactions. Here is the table focusing on the specified features:

Feature	ChatGPT	DeepSeek
Cloud Integrations	Integrates with Google Drive and OneDrive, allowing access and analysis of files.	No Cloud Integrations.
Web Search	Retrieves from the web to answer queries.	Retrieves from the web to answer queries.
Plugins	Supports third-party plugins.	Does not support third-party plugins.
Live Code Viewer	Displays a live preview.	Preview is limited(Only shows HTML code).
Voice Mode	Voice mode is available.	Voice mode is not available.
API & Workflow Automation	Provides API access for integration into existing workflows.	Offers API access at a lower cost integrating into various applications.
Image Support	Supports Image interaction.	Supports Image interaction.
Windows and Mac Apps	Available through browsers, app and application on Windows and Mac.	Available through browsers, and app. Lacks in desktop application
Scheduled Tasks	Does scheduled tasks when the task is set up.	Does not support scheduling tasks.
Team Support	Offers support with collaboration features.	Lacks specific features designed for team collaboration.

Accessibility and Price

DeepSeek offers excellent accessibility due to it is open-source nature, allowing users to run and modify it at a lower cost. This option makes customization and deployment more affordable than proprietary alternatives.

While DeepSeek’s open-source nature is appealing in the long run, it is less important for direct comparison unless you are deciding between using its API or operating your own instance. What counts today is that DeepSeek is absolutely free through online and mobile apps, with very few limitations (50 messages per day).  

ChatGPT’s free plan, on the other hand, has certain limitations. To get the most out of ChatGPT, you’ll need the $20/month Plus subscription and the data in the memory feeded are more transparent.

Wrapping Up the Battle: DeepSeek vs ChatGPT

The comparison between DeepSeek and ChatGPT reveals that both models excel in distinct areas, making them suitable for different user needs. DeepSeek demonstrates strong performance in technical content generation, coding accuracy, and structured reasoning, while ChatGPT excels in creative writing, multimodal capabilities, and real-world usability. DeepSeek’s Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture enhances efficiency in certain tasks, whereas ChatGPT’s dense model provides more natural and coherent responses across diverse applications. While DeepSeek outperforms ChatGPT in technical problem-solving and mathematical accuracy, ChatGPT offers superior accessibility, broader feature integration, and a refined user experience.

Ultimately, the choice between DeepSeek and ChatGPT depends on specific use cases. DeepSeek is ideal for developers, researchers, and technical users who prioritize precision and affordability, whereas ChatGPT remains the preferred option for general users, businesses, and those requiring seamless AI-driven assistance. As AI continues to evolve, future advancements in both models will likely push the boundaries of natural language processing, fostering greater innovation and accessibility in AI-powered communication.

FAQs